Record Details

PENERAPAN PENGENDALIAN HAMA TERPADU (PHT) TERHADAP WERENG BATANG COKLAT NILAPARVATA LUGENS (Stal) (Homoptera: Delphacidae) PADA TANAMAN PADI DI KABUPATEN SUMENEP

JURNAL AGROSAINS : Karya Kreatif dan Inovatif

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title PENERAPAN PENGENDALIAN HAMA TERPADU (PHT) TERHADAP WERENG BATANG COKLAT NILAPARVATA LUGENS (Stal) (Homoptera: Delphacidae) PADA TANAMAN PADI DI KABUPATEN SUMENEP
 
Creator N. Fajrullah, Ach. Syarif
Mudjiono, Gatot
Himawan, Toto
 
Description Integrated Pest Management (IPM) on study planthopper Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) (Homoptera: Delphacidae) on rice field in Sumenep district,  conducted to learn the effect the implementation of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) on the planthoppers population and enemies naturalto maintain the productivity of rice plants. The research was conducted in the village of Pragaan Laok, District Pragaan, Sumenep, East Java Province in October 2013 until March 2014. The method used was experimental method. Variables include the observation of the population of brown plant hopper rod, the rod brown planthoppers natural enemies, the intensity of the attack, the growth of the rice plant, productive tillers, panicle length, number of grains, and the real tile production (harvest time) and grain yield. In this study, the data were analyzed using t test to compare observations between IPM treatment with conventional treatment. The observation and discussion shows that 1) The population of brown plant hopper rod was not significantly different in the treatment of PHT compared to conventional treatment, 2) The population of natural enemies brown plant hopper rod for predatory spider Lycosa sp higher in IPM treatment than conventional treatments while Paederus fuscipes Staphylinidae beetle population is higher than conventional treatment IPM treatment, 3) The intensity of the attack on the treatment of IPM and conventional treatment is below the economic threshold, 4) The growth of rice plants was not significantly different in the treatment of IPM compared to conventional treatment, 5) The development of tillers and number of tillers were not significantly different in the treatment of IPM compared to conventional treatment, 6) Long panicles were not significantly different in the treatment of IPM compared to conventional treatment, while the large number of rice grains IPM treatment is lower than conventional treatment, 7) The results of tile is higher than conventional treatment IPM treatment but the real result (at harvest) higher than IPM treatment compared to conventional treatment , and 8) Grain yield results are not significantly different at IPM treatment be compared conventional treatments.
 
Publisher Universitas Islam Madura
 
Date 2015-12-27
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier https://journal.uim.ac.id/index.php/agrosains/article/view/202
10.31102/agrosains.2015.2.2.179-191
 
Source JURNAL AGROSAINS : Karya Kreatif dan Inovatif; Vol 2 No 2 (2015): Desember 2015; 179-191
JURNAL AGROSAINS : Karya Kreatif dan Inovatif; Vol 2 No 2 (2015): Desember 2015; 179-191
2598-4179
2407-6287
10.31102/agrosains.2015.2.2
 
Language eng
 
Relation https://journal.uim.ac.id/index.php/agrosains/article/view/202/155
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2015 Syarif
http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0